1986 PLP 439 (PLC)
GULZAR AHMAD Versus CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, HEADQUARTERS OFFICE, LAHORE
| Citation | 1986 PLP 439 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal |
| Parties | GULZAR AHMAD Versus CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, HEADQUARTERS OFFICE, LAHORE |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 439 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 439 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 439 (PLC) (GULZAR AHMAD Versus CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, HEADQUARTERS OFFICE, LAHORE). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Syed Muhammad Naqi for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 30th September, 1985.
Headnotes / Summary
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII oaf 1969)
Judgment & Decree
This is a complaint under section 38 (5) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 alleging that the respondent did not obey the direction of the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No.2, Lahore. The direction was that the respondent would decide the question of the entitlement to back benefits. The respondent has allowed leave due. Since question of entitlement to back benefits has been decided one way or the other, it cannot be said that the order of the learned Labour Court has not been complied with the petitioner is not satisfied with the order, he may challenge it but prima facie no case of contempt of Court stands made out.
2. As a result, the petition is dismissed. A.E. Petition dismissed