CLD 2008

2008 PLP 1183 (CLD)

AL-HAMD EDIBLE OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive — Plaintiffs Versus Syed WASEEM HYDER — Defendant

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2006-February-20
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2008 PLP 1183 (CLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties AL-HAMD EDIBLE OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive — Plaintiffs Versus Syed WASEEM HYDER — Defendant
Primary Law (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), (b) Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 1183 (CLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), (b) Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 1183 (CLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 1183 (CLD) (AL-HAMD EDIBLE OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive — Plaintiffs Versus Syed WASEEM HYDER — Defendant). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) (b) Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881)

Headnotes / Summary

O. XXXVII, Rr.2 & 3

Suit for recovery of amount on basis of promissory note and dishonored cheques

Plaintiffs claimed that they extended loan to defendant and on presentation, all the cheques were dishonoured

Suit was not contested by- the defendant on merits

Plaintiffs, in circumstances were entitled to recover the amount covered by the promissory note and the cheques

Suit was decreed accordingly.

S. 84

Non-presentation of cheque

Effect

Unless a cheque was presented for payment within a reasonable time of its issue, no right to recover the amount would accrue.

Judgment & Decree

MUSHIR ALAM, J.

This is a suit for recovery of Rs.41,14,852 based on dishonoured cheques. Defendant was served through publication in daily Nawa-i-Waqat dated 21-12-2006 but none choose to appear. This case was fixed for final disposal on 27-8-2007. On examining the record, it transpired that Promissory Note dated 14-9-2002 in the sum of Rs.16,81,129 is purportedly signed by the defendant. It was also noted that the Cheques as Annexures "C-4" to "C-14", "C-18" and "C-19" were not presented for encashment, therefore, the plaintiffs were called upon to explain as to when cheques which were not presented could not be made basis for recovery proceedings under summary chapter. Today Mr. Muhammad Taspim, learned counsel for plaintiffs appeared and conceded the position that the cheques, which were not presented the plaintiffs do not press the claim covered by such cheques for the time being. As regards Cheque dated 10-8-2003 in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Annexure "C/21" to the plaint), learned counsel for the plaintiffs concedes that though the same was dishonoured, has not been issued by the defendant but by one Syed Najmul Hassan Haider/Syed Najmul Ain Haider. It was conceded that the last mentioned cheque (Annexure "C/21") could not be made the basis for recovery proceedings against the present defendant. It is the case of plaintiffs that the plaintiffs being a manufacturer of Ghee and Cooking Oil extended loan of Rs.20,00,000 to the defendant and further a sum of Rs.16,81,129 was advanced by the plaintiffs to the defendant against the promissory note and receipt of the same date. It is further case of the plaintiffs that during the period from January, 2002 to August, 2003 the plaintiffs supplied various consignments of ghee and cooking oil to the defendant against payees account cheque. It is the case of plaintiffs that on presentation all the cheques were dishonored, therefore, the instant suit for recovery of amount covered by the promissory note and the dishonoured cheques. As noted in the narrative above, the Cheques as Annexures "C-4" to "C-14", "C-18" were never presented to the Bank. Unless a cheque is presented for payment within a reasonable time of its issue, no right to recover the amount accrues. For reference see section 84 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The instant suit is not contested on merits, therefore, in view of the foregoing, the plaintiffs are entitled to recover c the amount covered by the promissory note i.e.Rs.16,81,129and the amount covered by the cheques as tabulated given below: Sr. Name of Bank Cheque Number Date Amount

1. MCB Tariq Road Branch, PECHS, Karachi. 2386331 17-7-2002 Rs.1,11,000 2. " 2386333 17-1-2002 Rs.1,00,000 3 " 2386334 20-1-2002 Rs.1,25,000 4. " 2386345 20-1-2002 Rs.94,500 5. " 3129932 17-3-2002 Rs.2,00,000 6. " 3129933 21-3-2002 Rs.2,00,000 7. " 3129934 30-3-2002 Rs.2,42,503

8. MCB Kutchi Memon Society Branch, Amir Khusro Road, Karachi. 0155302 28-4-2003 Rs.50,000 Total: 10,12,003 Accordingly, the suit is decreed to the extent of amount covered by the promissory note i.e. Rs.16,81,129 and the cheques i.e.Rs.10,12,003 as shown in the above schedule total sum of Rs.26,93,

132. Let the decree be prepared in accordance with law. H.B.T./A-91/K Suit decreed.