PCRLJ 2005

2005 P Cr (PLP)

ANSAR ABBAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2005-January-18
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2005 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties ANSAR ABBAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 P Cr (PLP) (ANSAR ABBAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Khawar_Mehmood for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 498

Penal Code. (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324 & 452

Pre-arrest bail, refusal of

Accused had not disclosed in his bail application factum of dismissal of his earlier bail petitions twice before Trial Court as well as before High Court

Bail petition was dismissed for such concealment.

Judgment & Decree

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No. 19, dated 30-1-2004 under sections 324/452, P.P.C. registered at Police. Station Lalian, District Jhang.

2. The learned counsel for the parties have been heard:

3. The petitioner has sought pre-arrest bail from the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chiniot District Jhang twicely which was dismissed for non-prosecution, firstly on 154-2004 and secondly on 24-7-2004. Thereafter, the petitioner moved for pre-arrest bail before this Court, which was dismissed, on 15-12-2004. The petitioner has not disclosed the factum of his dismissal of earlier petitions before the learned Additional Sessions Judge as well as before this Court, in this petition. This petition is therefore, dismissed due to non-disclosure of earlier petitions filed by the petitioner, dismissed for non-prosecution by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chiniot twice as well before this Court. H.B.T./A-541/L Bail refused.