2000 PLP 1351 (YLR)
SAJID ALI and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2000 PLP 1351 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | SAJID ALI and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 PLP 1351 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 PLP 1351 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 PLP 1351 (YLR) (SAJID ALI and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Yousaf Kazmi for Petitioners.
- 2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that in fact obnoxious calls were received by Nizam Din, co-accused of petitioner and in this regard a complaint was made to Police and the Police arrived at the place of occurrence at 9 p.m. on 3-9-1999 and remained there till 1 a.m. the next day but no action was taken against any person. Further submits that Javed Tahir, complainant, criminally trespassed into house of Nizam Din and when he was being apprehended, he tried to scale over the wall and in that process he received the injuries. Also submits that there is delay of 8 days in lodging the F.I.R. without any explanation and that no motive is given in the F.I.R. According to learned counsel Police instead of registering a case against the complainant, under the influence of his brother who is stated to be a Reporter in some newspaper registered the case against the petitioners and others.
Headnotes / Summary
S.498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.337 F(iii)l 337-F(v)337-A (ii)l 337-L(ii)
F.I.R. had been lodged after an unexplained delay of eight days
No motive had been furnished in the F.I.R.
Accused seemed to be respectable persons
Interim pre-arrest bail granted to accused was confirmed in circumstances. Khalid Naveed Dar, A.A.-G.
Judgment & Decree
According to allegations contained in F.I.R. lodged by Javed Tahir on 12-9-1999 are that petitioners and 2 others caused injuries on the person of the complainant resulting into fracture of his left arm and wrist.
2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that in fact obnoxious calls were received by Nizam Din, co-accused of petitioner and in this regard a complaint was made to Police and the Police arrived at the place of occurrence at 9 p.m. on 3-9-1999 and remained there till 1 a.m. the next day but no action was taken against any person. Further submits that Javed Tahir, complainant, criminally trespassed into house of Nizam Din and when he was being apprehended, he tried to scale over the wall and in that process he received the injuries. Also submits that there is delay of 8 days in lodging the F.I.R. without any explanation and that no motive is given in the F.I.R. According to learned counsel Police instead of registering a case against the complainant, under the influence of his brother who is stated to be a Reporter in some newspaper registered the case against the petitioners and others.
3. Learned counsel for State submits that according to investigation, Sajid-Ali was not present at the place of occurrence at the given time and that complainant has not joined the investigating although he was summoned many a times by the Investigating Officer.
4. I have heard learned counsel for parties and have gone through the record. There is delay of 8 days in lodging the F.I.R. without any explanation. No motive is given in the F. I. R. A Petitioners seem to be respectable persons. So, interim pre-arrest bail granted to petitioners is hereby confirmed. Disposed of. N.H.Q./S-9/L Pre-arrest bail confirmed.