2007 PLP 1358 (YLR)
KHURSHEED AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 1358 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J |
| Parties | KHURSHEED AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 1358 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 1358 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 1358 (YLR) (KHURSHEED AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Javed Akhtar Wains for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.382, 406 & 420
Accused was in jail for more than one year and eight months
Co-accused were admitted to bail
Matter was reported to the police after a delay of more than 5-1/2 months
Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances. Ijaz Ahmad Khan for the State with Irfan, A.S.-I.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J.
Khursheed Ahmad has sought post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.428 registered at Police Station, City Lodhran on 30-10-2004 for offences under sections 382/406/420, P.P.C.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accused after overpowering the complainant committed robbery of 9,80,000 rupees.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the relevant record.
4. It is, stated at bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he was arrested on 9-11-2004 and is in jail for more than one year and eight months. Muhammad Sadiq and Faiz Bakhsh, co-accused of the petitioner, were admitted to bail by the learned trial Court vide order A dated 20-3-2006. It is also noteworthy that the matter was reported to the police after a delay of more than 5-1/2 months. In the above noted circumstances, I admit the petitioner to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of rupees one lac with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./K-2/L?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.