2010 PLP 148 (GBLR)
COLLECTOR SKARDU and 2 others — Petitioners Versus Mst. KHADIJA — Respondent
| Citation | 2010 PLP 148 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Northern Areas Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, C.J., Syed Jaffar Shah and Muhammad Yaqoob, JJ |
| Parties | COLLECTOR SKARDU and 2 others — Petitioners Versus Mst. KHADIJA — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 148 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 148 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Northern Areas Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, C.J., Syed Jaffar Shah and Muhammad Yaqoob, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 148 (GBLR) (COLLECTOR SKARDU and 2 others — Petitioners Versus Mst. KHADIJA — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Advocate-General for Petitioners.
- Ghulam Nabi, Advocate for Respondent.
- The learned Advocate-General states that the arrangement for payment of decreetal amount is in process with the Government and as per his instruction the payment will be made within three months. The learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the respondent with a view to avoid the effect of attachment order, have come up with a new plea.
- Be that as it may, we after hearing the learned Advocate-General and Mr. Ghulam Nabi learned Counsel for the respondent with the consent of parties dispose of this petition in the following manner:
Headnotes / Summary
O.XXI, Rr.54 & 55
Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Art. 60(13)
Removal of attachment
Bank guarantee, furnishing of
Judgment debtor contended that payment of decretal amount would be made within three months
Execution proceedings before Executing Court continued which would be concluded within three months and subject to furnishing of bank guarantee of scheduled bank, equal to decretal amount by defendants, within fifteen days to the satisfaction of Executing Court, the attachment order would remain suspended, failing which attachment order would become operative automatically
Petition was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
The learned Advocate-General states that the arrangement for payment of decreetal amount is in process with the Government and as per his instruction the payment will be made within three months. The learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the respondent with a view to avoid the effect of attachment order, have come up with a new plea. Be that as it may, we after hearing the learned Advocate-General and Mr. Ghulam Nabi learned Counsel for the respondent with the consent of parties dispose of this petition in the following manner: The execution proceeding before the Executing Court will continue, which will be concluded within three months and subject to the furnishing of Bank guarantee of a scheduled Bank, equal to the decreetal amount by respondents or by respondent No.3 (Superintendent of Police) as the case may be within fifteen (15) days to the satisfaction of executing Court, the attachment order passed on 16-8-2008 by the executing Court will remain suspended, failing which this order will automatically come to an end and the attachment order will become operative. Disposed of. M.H./13/Glt. Order accordingly.