P L D (Rev (PLP)
Syed ABBAS HUSSAIN‑Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent
| Citation | P L D (Rev (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | J. W. Hearn, Financial Commissioner |
| Parties | Syed ABBAS HUSSAIN‑Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D (Rev (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D (Rev (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: J. W. Hearn, Financial Commissioner.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D (Rev (PLP) (Syed ABBAS HUSSAIN‑Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Abdul Rahim, for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
Syed ABBAS HUSSAIN‑Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent Appeal No. 219 of 1949‑50, decided, on 19th April 1950, from‑the order of R. T. A. Lahore, dated 11th January 1950. Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939)‑
Regional Transport Authority, whether competent to issue half permits. Secretary R. T. A. Lahore, for the Crown.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 219 of 1949‑50, decided, on 19th April 1950, from‑the order of R. T. A. Lahore, dated 11th January 1950. Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939)‑
Regional Transport Authority, whether competent to issue half permits. Abdul Rahim, for Appellant. Secretary R. T. A. Lahore, for the Crown. This is an appeal against the order of the Regional Transport Authority, Lahore, dated the 11th January 1950, by which that Authority refused in effect to convert the half permit owned by the appellant into a full permit. Neither the Act nor the Rules contemplate a half permit and the Regional Transport Authorities are competent to issue full permits only. The original grant of a half permit to the appellant did not, therefore, in my opinion comply with the provisions of the Act. In view of the fact that the Authority decided to refuse to convert this half permit into a full permit, there was in my opinion only one course open to it, i.e. the one which it adopted. I am inclined to think, however that the time given to the appellant to carry out the order of the Authority was somewhat short and I would, therefore, suggest to the Authority that it should extend the period both to this appellant and the other affected by the order. With these remarks, I remand the case to the Authority for recon sideration. K. M. A. Case remanded.