2016 PLP 243 (GBLR)
MUHAMMAD ALI AKHTER and another — Petitioners Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2016 PLP 243 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ALI AKHTER and another — Petitioners Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2016 PLP 243 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2016 PLP 243 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2016 PLP 243 (GBLR) (MUHAMMAD ALI AKHTER and another — Petitioners Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Manzoor Ahmed, Advocate for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
O. XXXIX, Rr.1, 2 & S. 151
Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Art. 60
Application for grant of interim injunction
Petitioners agreed to pay cost, so fixed by the Chief Court if the case was remanded to the Chief Court
Request of the petitioners was allowed by the Supreme Appellate Court in the interest of justice and petitioners were directed to pay the cost
Case was remanded to the Chief Court to hear and decide the same on its merits
Supreme Appellate Court observed that status quo be maintained by the parties till the case fixed and application under O.XXXIX, Rr.1, 2 read with S.151, C.P.C., filed by the petitioners was heard and decided by the Chief Court.
Judgment & Decree
At the very outset of the proceedings on suggestion, the learned counsel for the petitioners agreed to pay cost, so fixed by the learned Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court, if the case is remanded back to the learned Chief Court.
2. We in the interest of justice allow the request and direct the learned counsel for the petitioners to pay the cost in the learned Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court. The case is remanded back to the learned Chief Court to hear and decide the same on its merit.
3. Meanwhile, the status quo be maintained by the parties till the case is fixed and application under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151, C.P.C. so filed by the petitioners is heard and decided in the learned Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court. The case is remanded back. HBT/88/GB Case remanded.