1981 PLP 106 (CLC)
Messrs IBAD & COMPANY‑Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD. AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 106 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim and Tanzil‑ur‑Rehman, JJ |
| Parties | Messrs IBAD & COMPANY‑Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD. AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | (a) Contract Act (IX of 1872) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 106 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Contract Act (IX of 1872) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 106 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim and Tanzil‑ur‑Rehman, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 106 (CLC) (Messrs IBAD & COMPANY‑Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD. AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S. E. Hussaini for Appellant.
- Kamal Azfar for Respondents.
- Dates of hearing: 14th and 23rd April, 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 2‑Interpretation f documents‑‑Arbitration agreement‑Contract Arbitration agreement-Essentially a contract .and to be governed by same rules in matter of interpretation as apply to construction of contract‑Contract to be construed in harmonous manner and each part to be construed in harmony with other parts so that a rational meaning be given to all parts of contract.‑[Arbitration‑Interpretation of documents]. Mst. Akbari Begum v. Rehmat Hussain and others A I R 1933 All. 861; Udit Singh and others v. Ram Lakhan Singh and 8 others A I R 1933 All. 313; Lakshmi Narain v. Ram Babu and another A I R 1963 All. 9; Muhammad Akram and others v. Ch. Muhammad Salim P L D 1963 Lah. 490; Ch. Muhammad Saleem v. Muhammad Akram and others P L D 1971 S C 516 and Ali Hussain v. Rafiquddin and 9 others P L D 1977 Lah. 418 ref. (b) Interpretation of documents‑ ‑‑ Earlier clause of deed followed by a later clause and such clause destroying altogether obligation created by earlier clause ‑ Later clause, held, to be rejected as repugnant and earlier clause to prevail.
Judgment & Decree
S. 2‑Interpretation f documents‑‑Arbitration agreement‑Contract Arbitration agreement-Essentially a contract .and to be governed by same rules in matter of interpretation as apply to construction of contract‑Contract to be construed in harmonous manner and each part to be construed in harmony with other parts so that a rational meaning be given to all parts of contract.‑[Arbitration‑Interpretation of documents]. Mst. Akbari Begum v. Rehmat Hussain and others A I R 1933 All. 861; Udit Singh and others v. Ram Lakhan Singh and 8 others A I R 1933 All. 313; Lakshmi Narain v. Ram Babu and another A I R 1963 All. 9; Muhammad Akram and others v. Ch. Muhammad Salim P L D 1963 Lah. 490; Ch. Muhammad Saleem v. Muhammad Akram and others P L D 1971 S C 516 and Ali Hussain v. Rafiquddin and 9 others P L D 1977 Lah. 418 ref. (b) Interpretation of documents‑ ‑‑ Earlier clause of deed followed by a later clause and such clause destroying altogether obligation created by earlier clause ‑ Later clause, held, to be rejected as repugnant and earlier clause to prevail. S. E. Hussaini for Appellant. Kamal Azfar for Respondents. Dates of hearing: 14th and 23rd April, 1980.