1990PLC44 (PLP)
DISTRICT MANAGER, KTC, KARACHI Versus MUKHTAR AHMAD and another
| Citation | 1990PLC44 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh |
| Bench Members | Ahmed Ali U. Qureshi, Appellate Tribunal |
| Parties | DISTRICT MANAGER, KTC, KARACHI Versus MUKHTAR AHMAD and another |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990PLC44 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990PLC44 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Ahmed Ali U. Qureshi, Appellate Tribunal.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990PLC44 (PLP) (DISTRICT MANAGER, KTC, KARACHI Versus MUKHTAR AHMAD and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Gul Muhammad Soomro for Appellant
- Date of hearing: 3rd August, 1989
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.25‑A‑‑Removal from service‑‑Reinstatement‑‑Workman, a bus conductor was removed from service on the charge that he realized fare from passengers without issuing tickets to them‑‑None of persons from whom fare was alleged to have been charged by conductor without issuing tickets was examined either before Enquiry Officer or before the Labour Court‑‑In absence of sufficient evidence to prove charge against workman, he was rightly, reinstated by Labour Court.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S.25‑A‑‑Removal from service‑‑Reinstatement‑‑Workman, a bus conductor was removed from service on the charge that he realized fare from passengers without issuing tickets to them‑‑None of persons from whom fare was alleged to have been charged by conductor without issuing tickets was examined either before Enquiry Officer or before the Labour Court‑‑In absence of sufficient evidence to prove charge against workman, he was rightly, reinstated by Labour Court. Gul Muhammad Soomro for Appellant Date of hearing: 3rd August, 1989 This is an appeal against the order of learned Presiding Officer, Sind Labour Court No.l, Karachi, dated 15‑4‑1989, whereby grievance application of the respondent was allowed and he was ordered to be reinstated without back benefits.
2. The respondent was removed from service, after due enquiry on the charge that he had taken 10 male passengers and 10 girl students in the bus and realised fare from them without issuing them tickets. The learned Labour Court has formed the opinion that there was no sufficient evidence proving this charge as none of the persons from whom fare is alleged to have been charged by the respondent without issuing tickets has been examined either before the Enquiry Officer or before the Labour Court. This Tribunal has consistently held in number of cases that without such evidence this charge cannot be considered to have been proved to warrant removal of service of the alleged defaulter.
3. In view of above position find no merits in this appeal which is dismissed in limine. H.B.T./1476/Lb. S Appeal dismissed