1986 PLP 1409 (SCMR)
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another — Petitioners Versus Rao MUHAMMAD YASIN KHAN — Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1409 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Haleem, C. J., Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another — Petitioners Versus Rao MUHAMMAD YASIN KHAN — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1409 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1409 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, C. J., Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1409 (SCMR) (FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another — Petitioners Versus Rao MUHAMMAD YASIN KHAN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Munir A Shaikh, Deputy Attorney-General and Ch. Akhtar Ali. Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 14th April, 1986.
- Munir A Shaikh, Deputy Attorney‑General and Ch. Akhtar Ali. Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order, dated 6-10-1985 of the Federal Service Tribunal passed in Appeal No.93 (R) of 1984).
Art. 212 (3)--Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.5--Leave to appeal granted to consider question whether Federal Service Tribunal was legally empowered to give a direction in terms that respondent "shall be deemed to have continued in N.P.S. 19 after his reversion from Northern Areas with all consequential benefits" in the context of admitted fact that he was not regularly promoted to Grade-19.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.‑‑Leave to appeal is granted to consider the following question: Whether the Federal Service Tribunal was legally empowered to give a direction in terms that the first respondent "shall be deemed to have continued in N.P.S. 19 after his reversion from the Northern Areas with all consequential benefits", in the context of the admitted fact that he was not regularly promoted to Grade
19. The interim order in the meanwhile is modified to the extent that the impugned order is suspended qua the direction of the first respondent to the higher post. The appeal arising from this petition shall be heard on the present record with liberty to the parties to file additional documents, if any. M.I. Leave granted.