1990 PLP 706 (SCMR)
PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED through its Managing Director — Petitioner Versus FAZAL BEG and others — Respondents,
| Citation | 1990 PLP 706 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Shafiur Rahman and Ahdul Shakurul Salam, JJ |
| Parties | PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED through its Managing Director — Petitioner Versus FAZAL BEG and others — Respondents, |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (vi of 1968) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 706 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (vi of 1968) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 706 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman and Ahdul Shakurul Salam, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 706 (SCMR) (PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED through its Managing Director — Petitioner Versus FAZAL BEG and others — Respondents,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Bashir Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Qamarud Din Meo, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Shahid Hussain Qadri, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Muhammad Aslam, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 11th February, 1990.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 15-4-1989 passed in Writ Petition No:2011 of 1982).
S.2(i)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.l85(3)
Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether petitioner, a Security Jamadar, fell within definition of `workman' and if not, what was the secured right under law available to him.
Judgment & Decree
S.2(i)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.l85(3)
Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether petitioner, a Security Jamadar, fell within definition of `workman' and if not, what was the secured right under law available to him. Malik Bashir Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Qamarud Din Meo, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Shahid Hussain Qadri, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Muhammad Aslam, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents. Date of hearing: 11th February, 1990. SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.--Leave to appeal is granted to examine whether the petitioner, a Security Jamadar, falls within the definition of `workman' as defined in Standing Orders Ordinance. If not, what is the secured right under the law available to him. To be Fixed at an carly date- Interim order to continue. H.B.T./P-127/S Leave granted.