SCMR 1983

1983 PLP 949 (SCMR)

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus ILAM DIN AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Appeal No. 110 of 1974, decided on 3rd May, 1982.
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and M. S. H. Quraishi, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1983 PLP 949 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and M. S. H. Quraishi, JJ
Parties MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus ILAM DIN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Primary Law Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 PLP 949 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 PLP 949 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and M. S. H. Quraishi, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 PLP 949 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus ILAM DIN AND ANOTHER-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958

Representation

  • Muhammad Naazar Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellants.
  • S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No. 1
  • Date of hearing : 3rd May, 1982.
  • Muhammad Naazar Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellants.
  • S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No. 1

Headnotes / Summary

(Against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, dated 23-11-1973, passed in Writ Petition No. 754-R/66). -- S. 2 (4)-Municipal record showing premises in dispute as separate shop even before independence and assessed accordingly-View of High Court declaring same as separate shop, upheld, in circumstances. Respondent No. 2 : Ex parte.

Judgment & Decree

ASI.AM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑This Appeal is directed by Leave of the Court against the judgment of the High Court, dated 23‑11‑1973 in a settlement matter.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant at length. The only question on which the case turns is whether the property bearing No. 3/413 situated on Hakim Khadim Ali Road, Sialkot City, was merely a deori or a separate shop. The High Court declared it as a separate shop vide the impugned judgment. Leave was granted to consider the correctness of the same. A perusal of the municipal record, pertaining to year 1942 shows that, this property was treated as a separate shop, even before the Partition and was assessed accordingly. The High Court was justified for taking the aforementioned view. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed as being without merit. H. Z. M. Appeal dismissed.