1989 PLP 323(1) (MLD)
RIASAT ALI and another‑‑Petitioners Versus LIAQUAT ALI and 8 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 323(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Fazal‑e‑Mahmood, J |
| Parties | RIASAT ALI and another‑‑Petitioners Versus LIAQUAT ALI and 8 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Muhammadan Law‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 323(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Muhammadan Law‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 323(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Fazal‑e‑Mahmood, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 323(1) (MLD) (RIASAT ALI and another‑‑Petitioners Versus LIAQUAT ALI and 8 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Taki Ahmad Khan for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Minor, welfare of‑‑Compromise‑‑Parties arriving at a compromise which was placed on record through application of parties which were allowed as per joint request of parties‑‑Decree‑holder, mother of minors appointed as guardian ad litem appearing in Court and stating that she wanted money for education and betterment of minor children‑‑Guardian also informed that she had not entered into second marriage‑‑Prima facie compromise appearing in interest of minors‑ Parties making mutual adjustment‑‑Order passed in terms of compromise‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OXXIII, R.3. Sh. Muhammad Siddique for Applicants/Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Revision No. 615‑D and Civil Miscellaneous Nos. 339‑C and 3392‑C of 1983, decided on 19th September, 1988. ‑‑‑Minor, welfare of‑‑Compromise‑‑Parties arriving at a compromise which was placed on record through application of parties which were allowed as per joint request of parties‑‑Decree‑holder, mother of minors appointed as guardian ad litem appearing in Court and stating that she wanted money for education and betterment of minor children‑‑Guardian also informed that she had not entered into second marriage‑‑Prima facie compromise appearing in interest of minors‑ Parties making mutual adjustment‑‑Order passed in terms of compromise‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OXXIII, R.3. Taki Ahmad Khan for Petitioners. Sh. Muhammad Siddique for Applicants/Respondents. The parties according to the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondents have arrived at a compromise which is recorded in C.M. No. 3390‑C/88. Similarly in connected Civil Revision No. 616/D of 1983, C.M. 3392‑C of 1988 has been filed incorporating the terms of the compromise. Both these applications are allowed as per joint request. The learned counsel point out that Mst. Safia Bibi the mother of the minors has been appointed as guardian ad litem. She is present and is recognised by the learned counsel. She has stated that she wants money for the education and betterment of the minor children. She also informs that she has not entered into a second marriage. In these circumstances prima facie it appears that the compromise is in the best interest of the minors. This disposes of C.M. Nos. 3390‑C/88 and 3392‑C/88. Since both the Civil Miscellaneous Applications for compromise have been disposed of as the parties have made mutual adjustments both the civil revisions are also disposed of in terms of the compromise. M.Y.H./R‑120/L Order accordingly.