1984 PLP 1052(2) (SCMR)
Shahzada PERVEZ KHAN-Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTARY OF DEFENCE AND ANOTHER-Respondents
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1052(2) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Shahzada PERVEZ KHAN-Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTARY OF DEFENCE AND ANOTHER-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1052(2) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1052(2) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1052(2) (SCMR) (Shahzada PERVEZ KHAN-Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTARY OF DEFENCE AND ANOTHER-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Sadiq Muhammad Warraich, Advocate Supreme Court and Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 13th November, 1983.
- Ch. Sadiq Muhammad Warraich, Advocate Supreme Court and Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal, dated 7-4-1983 in Appeal No. 27(R) of 1982). -- Art. 212(3)-Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4-Civil services-Finding of fact by Tribunal that petitioner was not a civil servant-No material available to justify interference with finding reached by Tribunal-Leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑ Art. 212(3)‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4‑Civil services‑Finding of fact by Tribunal that petitioner was not a civil servant‑No material available to justify interference with finding reached by Tribunal‑Leave to appeal refused. Ch. Sadiq Muhammad Warraich, Advocate Supreme Court and Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 13th November, 1983. MUHAMMAIZ AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑The challenge in this petition arising out of a disciplinary action, is to a finding of fact by a Service Tribunal that the petitioner was not a civil servant hence his so‑called service appeal was not competent. Learned counsel is unable to give the scale of pay, if any; the order of appointment of the petitioner or subsequent transfer of the petitioner allegedly as a civil servant. That being so, there is no material to justify interference with the finding reached by the Tribunal. This petition accordingly is dismissed. S. Q. Petition dismissed.