1981 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD AND OTHERS Versus PUNJAB SERVICE TRIBUNAL LAHORE, ETC.
| Citation | 1981 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court |
| Bench Members | Karam Elahee Chauhan and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ |
| Parties | PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD AND OTHERS Versus PUNJAB SERVICE TRIBUNAL LAHORE, ETC. |
| Primary Law | Civil Service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court bench comprising: Karam Elahee Chauhan and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD AND OTHERS Versus PUNJAB SERVICE TRIBUNAL LAHORE, ETC.). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Zia Mahmood Mirza, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 27th April, 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 13-3-1980 in Appeal No. 47/553 of 1980.
Service Tribunal, directing Road Transport Board to implement a certain Government older within one month and submit necessary report‑‑Contention that neither petitioner (Road Transport Board etc.) bound by Government order in question nor Service Tribunal possessed jurisdiction to issue sects a direction‑‑Held : Stage not yet ripe for filing petition before Supreme Court‑‑Petitioners if having any grievance ought to have first raised objection before Tribunal concerned so that Supreme Court could have benefit of views of Tribunal on subject.
Judgment & Decree
KARAM ELAHEE CHAUHAN, J.‑This is a petition against an order dated 13‑3‑1980. whereby the Punjab Service Tribunal, has directed the petitioner namely, Punjab Road Transport Board etc. to implement the Government order mentioned therein within one month and submit the necessary report in that respect. The case has been fixed before the Tribunal, for 28‑4‑1980, to see the further progress in the matter. The case of the petitioners is that they were not bound by the Government order compliance whereof was sought to be secured by the Tribunal and nor the Tribunal even otherwise has any jurisdiction to issue a direction of the kind contained in the impugned order. In our opinion this is not a stage at which the petition of the present kind could have been filed in this Court. The petitioners have been directed t comply with certain order of the Government and if they had any objection to the same they should first raise it before the Tribunal so that we may have the benefit of the views of the Tribunal on the subject. The petition in these circumstances does not merit admission and being misconceived is dismissed accordingly. Petition dismissed.