2004P3060 (PLP)
N/A
| Citation | 2004P3060 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | N/A |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004P3060 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004P3060 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004P3060 (PLP) (N/A). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Saadullah Khan for Petitioner.
Judgment & Decree
Ss. 497/498
Principles-Court while dealing with a bail matter has only to see whether the accused is connected with the commission of the offence or not
For such purpose only tentative assessment of evidence is to be made and its deeper appreciation is not called for
Satisfaction of the Court is sufficient to determine that the case is a fit one or not for grant of bail. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324/452/34
Occurrence had taken place in broad-daylight
Matter was promptly reported to the police in the hospital
Accused was directly nominated in the F.I.R. with a specific role of firing
Medical evidence, spot witnesses, motive, recovery of crime-empty from the spot and abscondence of accused had, prima facie, connected the accused with the guilt
Bail was declined to accused in circumstances. Nauroz Khan v. The State and another 1999 PCr.LJ 698; Mehtar v. The State and another 2000 PCr.LJ 60 and Sher Ahmad and 5 others v. Jan Faqir and others 2003 PCr.LJ 528 ref. Saadullah Khan for Petitioner. Zia Jehangir for the State. Saeedullah Khan for the Complainant. Date of hearing: 21st June, 2004.