2001 P Cr (PLP)
ZAHID SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2001 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ZAHID SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 P Cr (PLP) (ZAHID SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Shahid Hussain Qadri for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302/34
Presence of accused on the spot was established during investigation
Non-recovery of weapon from the accused was of no help to him in the presence of ocular testimony which was in line with medical evidence
Specific role in the occurrence had been attributed to the accused
Offence with which the accused was charged was permissible with death
Judgment & Decree
Shahid Hussain Qadri for Petitioner. A.H. Masood for the State. Zahid Shah son of Jnayat Ali Shah seeks bail in F.I.R. No. 265 of 1999 registered with Police Station Hujra Shah Muqeem under section 302/34, P.P.C. for the murder of Ishfaq Ali.
2. Allegation voiced in the F.I.R. authored by Abbas Haider is that he alongwith others including his brother Ishfaq Ali were coming from the Dera of Muhammad Ramzan and going towards their house, when they reached near the Dera of Shaukat Ali, all of a sudden assailants including the petitioner armed with .12 bore gun-emerged and started raising Lalkaras for siding with Munir Hussain Shah. The attack was commenced by Shaukat Ali who fired with his gun which hit the deceased Ishfaq on his thigh followed by a fire at the hands of the petitioner which struck the deceased on back of left hand. Last fire was made by Ibad Ali Shah which missed the complainant party. Motive for the occurrence is stated to be intent of the complainant party to forcibly occupy the house of Munir Hussain, cousin of the complainant.
3. Post-arrest bail was declined by Additional Sessions Judge, Depalpur on 11-1-2000.
4. Learned counsel before us has contended that no recovery was effected from the petitioner and that he was declared innocent in the investigation. It is further stated that injury being on the hand was not the cause of death, therefore, discretion should be exercised in favour of the petitioner: Conversely, learned State Counsel has opposed the grant of bail.
5. The Additional Sessions Judge while declining bail specifically observed that during the investigation, presence of the petitioner is established. Non-recovery of weapon would be of no help in the presence of ocular testimony which is in line with the medical evidence. Specific role has been attributed to the petitioner. No ground for interference is made out as offence is punishable with death. Resultant) the application is dismissed. N.H.Q./Z-26/L ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail refused.