1992 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD AHSAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1992 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Sh. Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AHSAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Sh. Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD AHSAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ch. Inayat Ullah Cheema for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Surrender of Illicit Arms Ordinance (XX of 1991), S.7‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused was stated to be first offender‑‑‑One of the public witnesses had submitted an affidavit in support of accused in which he stated that he did not witness any recovery‑‑‑Bail was granted to accused in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Surrender of Illicit Arms Ordinance (XX of 1991), S.7‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused was stated to be first offender‑‑‑One of the public witnesses had submitted an affidavit in support of accused in which he stated that he did not witness any recovery‑‑‑Bail was granted to accused in circumstances. Ch. Inayat Ullah Cheema for Petitioner. Muhammad Ahsan was arrested on 27‑3‑1992 on the allegation of possessing an unlicensed Klashanikov and five bullets. The recovery,, was witnessed by Muhammad Iqbal, Muhammad Ishaq and Muhammad Ramzan
2. Bail is urged on the grounds that the only public witness namely Muhammad Ishaq has submitted an affidavit to the effect that he did not witness any such recovery.
3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application. According to him the offence falls within the prohibitory clause and further that the police witnesses are as good witnesses as the public witness.
4. The petitioner is stated to be a first offender. Admittedly Muhammad Ishaq the public witness has submitted an affidavit in support of the petitioner. A In this view of the matter he is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.15,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./M‑494/L Bail granted