1995 PLP 657 (CLC)
Mst. RAZIA BEGUM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, JHANG and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1995 PLP 657 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J |
| Parties | Mst. RAZIA BEGUM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, JHANG and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 657 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 657 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 657 (CLC) (Mst. RAZIA BEGUM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, JHANG and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Allah Yar for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
- Atta Muhammad Sampal for Respondent No. 3
- Date of hearing: 7th May, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 5 & Sched.‑‑‑Dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula'‑‑‑Suit for dissolution of marriage was filed by wife after about 1‑1/2 years of marriage‑‑ Wife while appearing as her own witness apart from levelling other allegations against her husband had clearly stated that it was not possible to bring about reconciliation between spouses‑‑‑Despite best efforts made by Courts wife remained adament in her refusal to live with her husband‑‑‑High Court also tried to persuade wife to live with her husband, but she declined to do so stating that it was not possible for her to do so‑‑‑Refusal to grant Khula` to wife in such circumstances would tantamount to forcing parties to live in a hateful union which would be contrary to all norms of justice‑‑‑High Court granted Khula` to wife considering that it was not possible for parties to live as husband and wife within limits prescribed by Almighty Allah Dr. Akhlaq Ahmad v. Mst. Kishwar Sultana and others PLD 1983 SC 169 ref.
Judgment & Decree
Writ Petition No. 11035 of 1992, decided on 7th May, 1994. ‑‑‑‑S. 5 & Sched.‑‑‑Dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula'‑‑‑Suit for dissolution of marriage was filed by wife after about 1‑1/2 years of marriage‑‑ Wife while appearing as her own witness apart from levelling other allegations against her husband had clearly stated that it was not possible to bring about reconciliation between spouses‑‑‑Despite best efforts made by Courts wife remained adament in her refusal to live with her husband‑‑‑High Court also tried to persuade wife to live with her husband, but she declined to do so stating that it was not possible for her to do so‑‑‑Refusal to grant Khula` to wife in such circumstances would tantamount to forcing parties to live in a hateful union which would be contrary to all norms of justice‑‑‑High Court granted Khula` to wife considering that it was not possible for parties to live as husband and wife within limits prescribed by Almighty Allah Dr. Akhlaq Ahmad v. Mst. Kishwar Sultana and others PLD 1983 SC 169 ref. Malik Allah Yar for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 and
2. Atta Muhammad Sampal for Respondent No. 3 Date of hearing: 7th May, 1994.