1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
MUKHTAR AHMED QURESHI Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Federal Service Tribunal |
| Bench Members | S .M. Ishaq Misbah Ullah Khan and Ch. Hasan Nawaz, Members |
| Parties | MUKHTAR AHMED QURESHI Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI and another |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Federal Service Tribunal bench comprising: S .M. Ishaq Misbah Ullah Khan and Ch. Hasan Nawaz, Members.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MUKHTAR AHMED QURESHI Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.S. Siddiqi for Appellant.
- Hafiz SA. Rehman for Respondents alongwith M/s. Muhammad Amin and Muhammad Aslam, D.Rs.
- Date of hearing: 20th November, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Time-barred appeal
Civil servant was awarded penalty of censure in consequence of disciplinary proceedings and was also disallowed moveover to Grade-18
Civil servant approached Authorities concerned for setting aside penalty of censure and awarding moveover, but his representations and appeals were rejected by Authorities
Appeal filed by civil servant before Tribunal after expiry of about 4 months from final rejection of representations/appeals by Authorities concerned, was time-barred and as such was not maintainable.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 347(R) of 1987, decided on 20th November, 1991. Civil service
Time-barred appeal
Civil servant was awarded penalty of censure in consequence of disciplinary proceedings and was also disallowed moveover to Grade-18
Civil servant approached Authorities concerned for setting aside penalty of censure and awarding moveover, but his representations and appeals were rejected by Authorities
Appeal filed by civil servant before Tribunal after expiry of about 4 months from final rejection of representations/appeals by Authorities concerned, was time-barred and as such was not maintainable. M.S. Siddiqi for Appellant. Hafiz SA. Rehman for Respondents alongwith M/s. Muhammad Amin and Muhammad Aslam, D.Rs. Date of hearing: 20th November, 1991.