1981 PLP 1016 (CLC)
ASHRAF ALI JALALI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus NANAKRAM AND OTHERS‑ Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1016 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim, J |
| Parties | ASHRAF ALI JALALI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus NANAKRAM AND OTHERS‑ Respondents |
| Primary Law | Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Act (XII of 1957)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1016 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Act (XII of 1957)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1016 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1016 (CLC) (ASHRAF ALI JALALI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus NANAKRAM AND OTHERS‑ Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S. A. Kirmani for Petitioners.
- Kishinchand for Respondents Nos. 2 and 3.
- Nemo for Respondents Nos. 4 and 5.
- Date of hearing : 7th October, 1978.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ S. 22‑Declaration‑Order of Custodian declaring property in dispute as religious property challenged on grounds: (i) application under S. 22 of Act being not maintainable in law, (ii) findings of Custodian on merits being wholly unjustified, (iii) city survey extract showing property standing in names of certain individuals and not in name of Hindu Panchayat ‑ Custodian, failing to examine evidence brought on record and referred to by Courts below‑Order of Custodian set aside and case remanded to Custodian for disposal in accordance with law in circumstances. A. Sattar on Court Notice.
Judgment & Decree
Petition No. 1261 of 1974, decided on 14th October, 1978. ‑‑ S. 22‑Declaration‑Order of Custodian declaring property in dispute as religious property challenged on grounds: (i) application under S. 22 of Act being not maintainable in law, (ii) findings of Custodian on merits being wholly unjustified, (iii) city survey extract showing property standing in names of certain individuals and not in name of Hindu Panchayat ‑ Custodian, failing to examine evidence brought on record and referred to by Courts below‑Order of Custodian set aside and case remanded to Custodian for disposal in accordance with law in circumstances. S. A. Kirmani for Petitioners. Kishinchand for Respondents Nos. 2 and
3. A. Sattar on Court Notice. Nemo for Respondents Nos. 4 and