1969 PLP 3 (SCMR)
Major ABDUL QADEER KHAN‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMID AND OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1969 PLP 3 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Fazle‑Akbar, C. J. and Abdus Sattar, J |
| Parties | Major ABDUL QADEER KHAN‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMID AND OTHERS‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1969 PLP 3 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1969 PLP 3 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Fazle‑Akbar, C. J. and Abdus Sattar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1969 PLP 3 (SCMR) (Major ABDUL QADEER KHAN‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMID AND OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- A. S. Salam, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Masud Akhtar, Attorney for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 8th November 1968.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 21st February 1968, in L. P. A. No. 744 of 1966). Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1858), Sch. Part I‑Whether a person could claim transfer of house on basis of possession of his son when son himself had been unsuccessful in getting house transferred in his own name‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question.
Judgment & Decree
Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1858), Sch. Part I‑Whether a person could claim transfer of house on basis of possession of his son when son himself had been unsuccessful in getting house transferred in his own name‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question. A. S. Salam, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Masud Akhtar, Attorney for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing : 8th November 1968. ABDUS SATTAR, J.‑Leave is granted to consider whether Ch. Fateh Din, predecessor‑in‑interest of the respondents could claim transfer of the house in question on the basis of the possession of his son Abdul Hamid when the latter himself though unsuccessfully had asked for transfer of the said property. Leave was granted to consider a similar question in Civil Petition No. 255 of 1965. These two appeals will come up for hearing together. Security in the sum of Rs. 1,
000. Leave granted.