1987 PLP 431 (SCMR)
Mst. SIDDIQA and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS), MULTAN and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 431 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. SIDDIQA and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS), MULTAN and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 431 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 431 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 431 (SCMR) (Mst. SIDDIQA and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS), MULTAN and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ghulam Mahmood Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 28th October, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 12‑10‑1983 of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in C . P. No. 606 of 1980) . ‑‑‑Art. 188‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O. XXVI, R. 1 Review application for clarification‑‑Mistake in recital of facts‑‑Held, since order sought to be clarified merely upheld impugned order High Court, same order ruled the field.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑ This is an application for clarification of this Court's order, dated 12‑10‑1983. It is submitted that the mention of Khasra No.408 alongwith Khasra Nos. 409 and 410 as the Khasra Numbers in dispute was a mistake because in point of fact only Khasra Nos.409 and 410 were in dispute but not Khasra No.408. We may observe that this Court in its order dated 12th October, 1983 merely upheld the order of the High Court dated 31‑3‑1980. In the said order the facts were recited as under:‑ "The relevant facts of the case are that the land in dispute comprising Khasra Nos. 409 min and 410 min measuring about 2 Kanals along with other land, situated in village Qutabpur, District Multan." The above recital of facts appears to support the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that Khasra No. 408 was not in dispute between the parties. Be that as it may we would only observe that this Court in its order dated 12‑10‑1983 had merely maintained the order of the Lahore High Court dated 31‑3‑1980 and it was not our intention either to add to it or subtract from it in any way. Accordingly, the effect of the order of this Court dated 31‑3‑1980 is that the order of the High Court has been upheld and we clarify that the same rules the field. With this clarification this application stands disposed of. M.I./4421/S Order accordingly.