1991 PLP 445 (SCMR)
ALI GUL KHAN — Petitioner Versus LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1991 PLP 445 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Naimuddin, Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry and Ajmal Mian, JJ |
| Parties | ALI GUL KHAN — Petitioner Versus LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 445 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 445 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Naimuddin, Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry and Ajmal Mian, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 445 (SCMR) (ALI GUL KHAN — Petitioner Versus LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----Arts. 13, 25 & 184(3)---Petitioner's reinstatement in judiciary---Order of reinstatement was passed by the Governor as Appellate Authority---High Court's refusal to accept petitioner back in the judiciary---Leave to appeal---Petitioner making oral request to be allowed to withdraw petition so as to enable him to seek interview with the new Chief Justice as the former Chief Justice had declined to grant an interview to petitioner---Counsel for respondents having no objection to the withdrawal of petition, same was dismissed as withdrawn.
- M. Nawaz Abbasi, Assistant Advocate-General, Punjab and Rao Muhammad Yousuf Advocate-on-Record for Respondents:
- Date of hearing: 11th June, 1990.
- ‑‑‑‑Arts. 13, 25 & 184(3)‑‑‑Petitioner's reinstatement in judiciary‑‑‑Order of reinstatement was passed by the Governor as Appellate Authority‑‑‑High Court's refusal to accept petitioner back in the judiciary‑‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑‑Petitioner making oral request to be allowed to withdraw petition so as to enable him to seek interview with the new Chief Justice as the former Chief Justice had declined to grant an interview to petitioner‑‑‑Counsel for respondents having no objection to the withdrawal of petition, same was dismissed as withdrawn.
- M. Nawaz Abbasi, Assistant Advocate‑General, Punjab and Rao Muhammad Yousuf Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents:
- 2. On previous date, namely, 20th November, 1988 when the petition came up for hearing the learned Advocate‑General. Punjab was present. Following order was passed by the Bench headed by the then Chief Justice and consisting of three other Judges:‑
- 4. Mr. M. Nawaz Abbasi, learned Assistant Advocate‑General has no objection to the withdrawal of the petition.
Headnotes / Summary
Judgment & Decree
NAIMUDDIN, J: ‑‑This is a Constitution Petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. In this petition the petitioner has prayed as follows:‑‑ "That in the circumstances petitioner seeks enforcement of the fundamental rights guaranteed to him under Articles 25 and 13 of the Constitution and prays that the refusal of the High Court to accept the petitioner back in the Judiciary after the orders of reinstatement in judiciary passed in his favour by the Governor of the Punjab as Appellate Authority, be declared void in so far this refusal denies, abridges or interferes with the petitioner's exercise of fundamental rights. Respondent No.1 may also be directed to accept the petitioner back in the Judiciary in accordance with the lawful orders dated 18‑5‑1980 passed by the Appellate Authority in his favour."
2. On previous date, namely, 20th November, 1988 when the petition came up for hearing the learned Advocate‑General. Punjab was present. Following order was passed by the Bench headed by the then Chief Justice and consisting of three other Judges:‑ "The petition is adjourned to be heard at Rawalpindi after one month to enable the learned A.‑G. to contact the Government for providing a suitable post to the petitioner."
3. Today, the petitioner has made oral request that he may be allowed to withdraw the petition so that he may seek interview with the new Chief Justice as the former Chief Justice had declined to grant an interview to the petitioner.
4. Mr. M. Nawaz Abbasi, learned Assistant Advocate‑General has no objection to the withdrawal of the petition.
5. Accordingly, we dismiss this petition as withdrawn. A.A./789/S Petition dismissed.