1987 PLP 1138 (SCMR)
AHMAD ABDUL RAHEEM‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1138 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ |
| Parties | AHMAD ABDUL RAHEEM‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1138 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1138 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1138 (SCMR) (AHMAD ABDUL RAHEEM‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Ismail Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. A. Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 13th June, 1984.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 18‑1‑1981 of the Punjab Service Tribunal in Appeal No. 420 of 1979) ‑‑‑Art. 212‑‑Judgment of Tribunal not requiring any interference as grievance of petitioner had been largely met‑‑Petitioner, however, submitting that relief given by Service Tribunal had not yet been given effect to by the Provincial Government‑‑ Supreme Court directed the Provincial Government to implement the judgment of the Tribunal in letter and spirit forthwith, if same had not yet been done and disposed the petition with such observations.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art. 212‑‑Judgment of Tribunal not requiring any interference as grievance of petitioner had been largely met‑‑Petitioner, however, submitting that relief given by Service Tribunal had not yet been given effect to by the Provincial Government‑‑ Supreme Court directed the Provincial Government to implement the judgment of the Tribunal in letter and spirit forthwith, if same had not yet been done and disposed the petition with such observations. M. Ismail Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. A. Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 13th June, 1984. NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑This petition is directed against the judgment dated 18‑1‑1981 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal accepting, in part, the appeal preferred by the petitioner before it. We have heard Mr. Mohammad Ismail Qureshi, in support of this petition and feel that the judgment of the learned Punjab Service Tribunal does not require any interference as the grievance of the petitioner has been largely met. The learned counsel or the petitioner, however, submitted that the relief given by the Punjab Service Tribunal has not yet been given effect to by the Provincial Government. This is a matter of regret if this complaint is, indeed, correct. We would, therefore, direct the Provincial Government to implement the judgment of the Service Tribunal in the letter and spirit forthwith if this has not yet been done. This petition, with these observations, stands disposed of. M.B.A./A‑24/S Order accordingly.