1995 PLP 686 (PCRLJ)
DILMEER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1995 PLP 686 (PCRLJ) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | DILMEER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 686 (PCRLJ)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 686 (PCRLJ)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 686 (PCRLJ) (DILMEER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Altaf Ibrahim Oureshi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426(1-A)(c)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302
Accused was behind the bats for more than two years and there was no likelihood of early fixation of his appeal
Accused had, thus, earned the statutory right of bail
Sentence of accused was consequently suspended and he was admitted to bail accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2 of 1993 in Criminal Appeal No.268 of 1992 decided on 22nd November 1994.
S. 426(1-A)(c)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302
Accused was behind the bats for more than two years and there was no likelihood of early fixation of his appeal
Accused had, thus, earned the statutory right of bail
Sentence of accused was consequently suspended and he was admitted to bail accordingly. Altaf Ibrahim Oureshi for Petitioner. Sh. Muhammad Rahim for the State It is submitted that petitioner is behind the bar since 27-9-1992 and statutory right of bail has accrued to him.
2. I have heard the arguments and gone through the file. Admittedly the petitioner is behind the bar for more than two years and there is no likelihood of early fixation of this appeal. In this way he has earned the statutory right of bail. Without touching the merits of the case I suspend the sentence and admit the petitioner to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. one Lakh with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sahiwal. N.H.Q./D-41/L Sentence suspended.