2007 PLP 2831 (YLR)
Syed IRFAN HUSSAIN SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 2831 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, J |
| Parties | Syed IRFAN HUSSAIN SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 2831 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 2831 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 2831 (YLR) (Syed IRFAN HUSSAIN SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Zafar for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337-A(i), (ii) & (iv), 337-F(1)
Appli cation for grant of bail
Counsel for applicant/accused had opted not to press bail application on merits, but had only requested for direction to expedite the trial as applicant was behind the bars for .the last about 1-1/4 years, but not a single witness had been recorded
Bail application was dismissed, however the Trial Court was directed to conclude the trial within specified period. Naeem Tariq Sanghera, Dy. P.G. for the State. Ghulam Murtaza, A.S.-I. with the record.
Judgment & Decree
IJAZ AHMAD CHAUDHRY, J.
After arguing at some length learned counsel for the petitioner has opted not to press this bail petition on merits and only requests for a direction to expedite the trial as the petitioner is behind the bars for the last about 1-3/4 years, but so far not a single witness has been recorded.
2. In view of above, this application is dismissed as not passed. However, the learned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial of the case within three months from the receipt of copy of this orders. The A.S.I. present in the Court is also directed to convey this direction to the learned trial Court. However, the petitioner can approach this Court afresh, if the trial in the main case is not concluded within the stipulated period. H.B.T. /I-11 /L Order accordingly.