SCMR 1984

1984 PLP 200 (SCMR)

ANSAR BURNEY-Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Shariat Bench
Decided Date
Shariat Appeal No. K-1 of 1983, decided on 2nd November, 1983.
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1984 PLP 200 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Shariat Bench
Bench Members N/A
Parties ANSAR BURNEY-Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 200 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 200 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Shariat Bench bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 200 (SCMR) (ANSAR BURNEY-Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Nemo for Appellant.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 203-F-Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O. XXIII, para. 2-Time barred appeal-Appellant not appearing on date fixed-Appeal already adjourned one, having been fixed during last week-No arrangements made by appellant not even with regard to explanation for condoning delay beyond period of limitation in filing appeal--Telegram sent by appellant not disclosing sufficient cause for condoning delay nor applica tion made for condonation of delay-Appeal dismissed as time-barred in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J-- The appellant lm not appeared. He has sent a telegram for adjournment. This is already an adjourned appeal as the same was fixed for hearing during the last week. No arrangement has been made by the appellant not even with regard to the explanation for condoning the delay beyond the period of limitation in filing this appeal. The telegram at page 56 of the Paper Book does not disclose sufficient cause for condoning the delay nor in fact any application has been made for condonation. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as time‑barred. M. Z. M. Appeal dismissed.