1989 PLP 4401 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD AMIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 4401 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Rashid Aziz Khan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AMIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 4401 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 4401 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Rashid Aziz Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 4401 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD AMIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Wahid‑ud‑Din Virk for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused, son‑ in‑law of complainant‑‑Parties had compromised‑‑Complainant admitted to have forgiven accused‑‑Affidavits of all witnesses, exonerating accused, filed‑‑Case of further inquiry‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. Malik Ghulam Hussain for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1.538/B of 1989, decided on 21st May, 1989. ‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused, son‑ in‑law of complainant‑‑Parties had compromised‑‑Complainant admitted to have forgiven accused‑‑Affidavits of all witnesses, exonerating accused, filed‑‑Case of further inquiry‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. Wahid‑ud‑Din Virk for Petitioner. Malik Ghulam Hussain for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered against him under section 302, P.P.C. The case was got registered by Haji Nawab Din father of the deceased Mst. Shahnaz, against the petitioner who was son‑in‑law of the first informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there has been a compromise and the first informant along with witnesses in the case have given affidavits exonerating the petitioner. The first informant Haji Nawab Din also appeared in person who was identified by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that he had forgiven the petitioner. Since all the witnesses have given affidavits to the effect that they had not witnessed the occurrence, therefore, it becomes a case of further inquiry. In these circumstances the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.30,000 with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Sheikhupura. S.A/M‑1457/L Bail granted.