1988 PLP 201 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD NASIR alias GUDDU — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1988 PLP 201 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD NASIR alias GUDDU — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 201 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 201 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 201 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD NASIR alias GUDDU — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Ilyas Kornai for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.379 & 411--Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S. 14--Bail, grant of- Accused, not a previous convict in jail and not required for investigation--Offence not falling within. prohibitory clause--Bail granted in circumstances. Shamas-ul-Qamar for the State.
Judgment & Decree
This is an application for grant of bail to Muhammad Nasir alias Guddu petitioner in case under section 379/411, P.P.C. and Article 14 of the Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 registered at P.S. Naulakha, Lahore, vide F.I.R. No. 160 of 1987.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner was found in possession of stolen motor-cycle.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause. Learned counsel for the State has opposed this application on the ground that the petitioner stands involved in as many as 13 identical cases. 4. 1 have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I find that the petitioner is not a previous convict; that he is in the jail and no more required for investigation and that the alleged offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. For what has been said above, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. (City)/Duty Magistrate, Lahore. SA./M-608/L Bail granted.