1981 PLP 797 (CLC)
Mst. NOORI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 797 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Z. C. Valliani, J |
| Parties | Mst. NOORI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 797 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 797 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Z. C. Valliani, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 797 (CLC) (Mst. NOORI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Khuda Bux Omrani for Appellant.
- Hussain Adil for Respondent.
- Date of hearing : 2nd December, 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (Vi of 1959)‑ ‑‑ S. 15(l) read with Sind Civil Courts Rules, r. 323(1) and Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 12‑Appeal‑Period of limitation‑Computation‑ Appellant applying for certified copy of order dated 2‑4‑1973 on 27‑4‑1973‑Cost deposited on 12‑5‑1973‑Certified copy ready on 15‑5‑1973‑Stamps supplied on 24‑5‑1973‑Nothing on record to show appellants' counsel having been given required intimation regarding certified copy being ready‑Appeal filed on 26‑5‑1973‑Held, time of appeal extended for period of such further delay and appeal within time.‑[Appeal (civil)‑Limitation]. W. P. I. D. C., Karachi v. Aziz Qureshi P L D 1973 S C 222 rel. Gul Muhammad v. Allah Ditta P L D 1960 Lab. 443 and W. P. I. D. C., Karachi v. Aziz Qureshi P L D 1973 S C 222 ref. (b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ S. 15(4), Explanation read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 100‑Concurrent findings of fact‑Tenant (respondent) denying relationship of landlord and tenant in ejectment application filed by landlords (appellants)‑Rent Controller and Additional District Judge concluding as to appellants being not owners of premises in dispute‑ Held, two concurrent findings of fact of lower Courts being based on cogent reasons and on evidence produced by both parties, no reason to interfere with concurrent findings of fact in second appeal. [Findings of fact]. Abdul Majid v. Khalil Ahmed P L D 1955 F C 38 ; Asloob Elahi v. Mst. Maimoona Bibi P L D 1977 Kar. 277 ; Muhammad Hussain v. Habeeb Wall Muhammad P L D 1977 Kar. 1031 ; Ghulam Sadique v. Najibullah Khan P L D 1977 Kar. 1073 ; G. M. E. Patel v. Tajamul Hussain 1980 C L C 443 and Muhammad Ramzan v. Muhammad Tufail 1980 C L C 753 rel. Muhammad Ismail Ghori v. Muhammad Ismail P L D 1969 Kar. 306; Dr. Miss I. Ali Muhammad v. Muhammad Shafiq P L D 1971 S C 494 ; Usman Ghani v. Muhammad Amin Khan P L D 1975 Lab. 299 ; Abdullah v. Abdul Karim P L D 1968 S C 140 ; Gul Dad Khan v. Rahim Shah P L D 1978 Kar. 19 ; Bashir Ahmad v. Abdul Karim 1976 S C M R 417; Mansoor Hussain v. Mureed P L D 1974 Note 132 at p. 193 ; Abdul Ghafoor v. Sher Ahmad P L D 1961 Lab. 366 and Din Muhammad v. Abdul Aziz P L D 1967 Lab. 653 ref.
Judgment & Decree
15‑5‑1973‑Stamps supplied on 24‑5‑1973‑Nothing on record to show appellants' counsel having been given required intimation regarding certified copy being ready‑Appeal filed on 26‑5‑1973‑Held, time of appeal extended for period of such further delay and appeal within time.‑[Appeal (civil)‑Limitation]. W. P. I. D. C., Karachi v. Aziz Qureshi P L D 1973 S C 222 rel. Gul Muhammad v. Allah Ditta P L D 1960 Lab. 443 and W. P. I. D. C., Karachi v. Aziz Qureshi P L D 1973 S C 222 ref. (b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ S. 15(4), Explanation read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 100‑Concurrent findings of fact‑Tenant (respondent) denying relationship of landlord and tenant in ejectment application filed by landlords (appellants)‑Rent Controller and Additional District Judge concluding as to appellants being not owners of premises in dispute‑ Held, two concurrent findings of fact of lower Courts being based on cogent reasons and on evidence produced by both parties, no reason to interfere with concurrent findings of fact in second appeal. [Findings of fact]. Abdul Majid v. Khalil Ahmed P L D 1955 F C 38 ; Asloob Elahi v. Mst. Maimoona Bibi P L D 1977 Kar. 277 ; Muhammad Hussain v. Habeeb Wall Muhammad P L D 1977 Kar. 1031 ; Ghulam Sadique v. Najibullah Khan P L D 1977 Kar. 1073 ; G. M. E. Patel v. Tajamul Hussain 1980 C L C 443 and Muhammad Ramzan v. Muhammad Tufail 1980 C L C 753 rel. Muhammad Ismail Ghori v. Muhammad Ismail P L D 1969 Kar. 306; Dr. Miss I. Ali Muhammad v. Muhammad Shafiq P L D 1971 S C 494 ; Usman Ghani v. Muhammad Amin Khan P L D 1975 Lab. 299 ; Abdullah v. Abdul Karim P L D 1968 S C 140 ; Gul Dad Khan v. Rahim Shah P L D 1978 Kar. 19 ; Bashir Ahmad v. Abdul Karim 1976 S C M R 417; Mansoor Hussain v. Mureed P L D 1974 Note 132 at p. 193 ; Abdul Ghafoor v. Sher Ahmad P L D 1961 Lab. 366 and Din Muhammad v. Abdul Aziz P L D 1967 Lab. 653 ref. Khuda Bux Omrani for Appellant. Hussain Adil for Respondent. Date of hearing : 2nd December, 1980.