1983 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD HAYAT-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 1983 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Javid Iqbal, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD HAYAT-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Javid Iqbal, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD HAYAT-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rab Nawaz Khan Niazi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426-Sentence, suspension of-Medical report stating petitioner suffering from bilateral pulmonary tuberculosis-A case, held, made out for suspension of sentence, in circumstance.--[Bail] Mian Ghulam Rasul for the State.
Judgment & Decree
This is an application for suspension of sentence of Muhammad Hayat petitioner who has been convicted under section 13 of the Arms Ordinance, 1965, and sentenced to three years' R. I. The application for suspension of sentence is on medical ground. The report of the Medical Superinten dent is to the effect that he is suffering from bilateral pulmonary tuberculosis. It is stated in the report that he can be treated in the Jail Hospital and all the drugs are available in the Jail Hospital. But learned counsel states that the petitioner had been sent to Multan where he is admitted to the Jail Hospital but his condition had not improved as in the/ Jail Hospital he was not being properly attended to. Since the medical report is to the effect that he is suffering from bilateral pulmonary tuberculosis, a case is made out for the suspension of sentence. It is ordered accordingly and the petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 30,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Mianwali. Bail admitted.