YLR 2001

2001 PLP 632 (YLR)

SIKANDAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No.S-81 of 2001, decided on 13th April, 2001.
Honorable Judges
S. A. Rabbani, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2001 PLP 632 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members S. A. Rabbani, J
Parties SIKANDAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 632 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 632 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: S. A. Rabbani, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 632 (YLR) (SIKANDAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 399 & 401

Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S. 17(1)

Bail, grant of

Bail plea of the accused was refused by the Trial Court merely on the ground that the accused remained absconder

Accused though was declared proclaimed offender, but the notice in that respect was not published in newspapers

Co-accused had already been granted bail

Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Muhammad Saleem Jesar for Applicant. Muhammad Ismail Bhutto for the State.

Judgment & Decree

The applicant is facing trial before VI-Additional Sessions Judge, Larkana for offences under sections 401, 399, P.P.C and 17/1, Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. His bail plea has merely been refused by the learned trial Court on the ground that he remained absconder. Learned State Counsel admits that although he was declared proclaimed offender the notice was not published in newspapers before that. Mr. Muhammad Saleem Jesar submits that co-accused have already been granted bail. In view of the above facts and circumstances the applicant is admitted to bail subject to surety in the sum of Rs. 75,000 and P.R Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./S-98/K Bail granted.