PLD 1986

P L D 1986 Karachi 157 (1) (PLP)

NOOR MUHAMMAD‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
1985-April-23
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1986 Karachi 157 (1) (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties NOOR MUHAMMAD‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1986 Karachi 157 (1) (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1986 Karachi 157 (1) (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1986 Karachi 157 (1) (PLP) (NOOR MUHAMMAD‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497-Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art,. 4 ‑Bail‑Allegation against accused prima facie constituting an offence maximum punishment for which only two years and thirty stripes‑Such offence was bailable‑Counsel for State also having no objection to grant of bail to accusedBail allowed.

Judgment & Decree

S. 497-Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art,. 4 ‑Bail‑Allegation against accused prima facie constituting an offence maximum punishment for which only two years and thirty stripes‑Such offence was bailable‑Counsel for State also having no objection to grant of bail to accusedBail allowed. Ghulam Hyder Memon for Applicant Sarfraz Ahmad, A. A.‑G. for the State. As per F. I. R. one plastic bag containing Charas weighing 1,660 grams was recovered from the folds of right side of tee trouser of the accused and a small bag containing 290 grams Bhang was secured from the possession of the applicant. It is urged that the maximum punishment which can be awarded to the applicant in this case is two years and 30 stripes as per section 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979. Under Schedule 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure under the heading Offences Against other Laws', it is provided that where an offence is punishable with imprisonment for one year upwards but less than 3 years or with whipping not exceeding 40 stripes with or without imprisonment. such offence is bailable offence. Since in this case the allegations prima facie constitute an offence under section 40 the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979, for which the maximum sentence provided is 2 years and 30 stripes, therefore, the offence appears to be bailable. Even otherwise Mr. Sarfraz states that he has no objection, if bail is granted to the applicant. I, therefore, grant bail to the applicant in Crime No. 50 of 1985, of Police Station Town Nawabshah, on his furnishing one surety in the sum of Ra. 20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand only) with P. R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge. Nawabshah. M. Y. H. Bail allowed.