2007 PLP 1338 (YLR)
BIJAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 1338 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Faisal Arab, J |
| Parties | BIJAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 1338 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 1338 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Faisal Arab, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 1338 (YLR) (BIJAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.392
Accused was neither named in F.I.R. nor in statements under S.161, Cr.P.C. which were recorded on the next day
Accused was subsequently arrested by the police as one of the unnamed suspects in the crime
Accused was put to identification parade and was identified as one of accused persons, but complainant and prosecution witnesses had sworn affidavits before the Trial Court to the effect that they had not seen the present accused at the scene of the crime
Such fact had been confirmed by State counsel who stated that he conceded to the grant of bail as the case for further inquiry was made out
Accused was enlarged on bail. Muhammad Iqbal Mahar for Applicant. Mushtaque Ahmed Kourejo, State Counsel for the State.
Judgment & Decree
FAISAL ARAB, J.
An F.I.R. for highway robbery was lodged as Crime No.22 of 2006 at Police Station, Sardar Ghulam Sarwar Sarki, District Kashmore alias Kandhkot on 1-6-2006. The present applicant Bijar Nandwani is not named in the F.I.R. nor he was named in 161, Cr.P.C. statements which were recorded on the next day. Subsequently on 12-6-2006 the. applicant was arrested by police as one of the unnamed suspects in the above-mentioned crime. He was put to identification parade on 14-6-2006 and A identified as one of the accused persons. Subsequently complainant Muhammad Siddique and P.Ws. Pir Bux and Mansab have sworn affidavits before trial Court to the effect that they have not seen the present applicant at the scene of the crime. This fact has been confirmed by learned State counsel and states that he concedes to the grant of bail as the case for further enquiry is made out. In the circumstances the applicant is enlarged on bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.100,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. H.B.T./B-7/K Bail granted.