1989 PLP 504 (SCMR)
ALAMGIR KHAN — Petitioner Versus AQIQ KHAN — Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 504 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ |
| Parties | ALAMGIR KHAN — Petitioner Versus AQIQ KHAN — Respondent |
| Primary Law | (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 504 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 504 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 504 (SCMR) (ALAMGIR KHAN — Petitioner Versus AQIQ KHAN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kh. Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 16th October, 1988.
- Kh. Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order of the Peshawar High Court, Circuit Bench Abbottabad, dated 8-9-1987, passed in Writ Petition No.58 of 1987, and order dated 23-6-1987 passed in Civil Revision No.39 of 1987).
Art.185(3)--Petition for leave to appeal--Petitioner had been unsuccessful in his first round of litigation before Revenue authorities and in second round of litigation in Civil Courts right upto the High Court--Constitutional petition of the petitioner was also rightly dismissed because no jurisdictional defect in judgments of Revenue and Civil Courts was highlighted and in any case High Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction could not set aside its own order passed in its revisional jurisdiction--Petition for leave to appeal, against order of High Court passed in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction, being barred by time, and no good ground having been made out for condonation of delay, same was dismissed in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, J.‑‑This is a petition for leave to appeal from the order of a learned Division Bench of the Peshawar High Court, Circuit Bench Abbottabad, dated 8‑9‑1987 and the judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 23‑6‑1987 of the same learned Court.
2. The facts need not be given. The petitioner has been unsuccessful in his first round of litigation before the Revenue authorities and in the second round of litigation in the Civil Courts right upto the High Court where his Civil Revision was dismissed on 23‑6‑1987. His writ petition has rightly been dismissed on 8‑9‑1987 because no jurisdictional defect in the judgments of the Revenue and Civil Courts was highlighted and in any case the High Court could not set aside its own order passed on 23‑6‑1.987 in its revisional jurisdiction in the exercise of its writ jurisdiction.
3. The petition as against the order of the High Court passed on 23‑6‑1987 in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction is barred by time and no good ground is made out for condoning the delay.
4. The petition is dismissed: AA./A‑387/S?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????? Petition dismissed.