2006 PLP 939 (YLR)
GULZAR UNAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 939 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari, J |
| Parties | GULZAR UNAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 939 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 939 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 939 (YLR) (GULZAR UNAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.395
F.I.R. Was delayed by more than two months and no evidence was brought against accused to connect him with commission of crime
Alleged recovery of three cows but was made from a place which was not in exclusive possession of accused--Case of accused calling for further inquiry, he was directed to be enlarged on bail. Muhammad Nawaz for Applicant. Khawaja Muneer Ahmed for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, J.--The applicant along with co-accused persons is involved in Crime No.74 of 2005 registered at Police Station, Malir Cantt. on the complaint of Ali Teepu for allegedly committing robbery of five cows from his Bara on 12-8-2005. It is contended that F.I.R. was delayed by more than two months and that the applicant has been falsely implicated, there is no evidence against the applicant to connect him with commission of crime as the alleged recovery of three cows was not made from his exclusive possession. Learned State counsel has opposed grant of bail but has not been able to controvert that the F.I.R. was delayed and that the recovery of cows was made from a place which was not in exclusive possession of the applicant. In view of above position, case of the applicant calls for further enquiry. The applicant is accordingly directed to be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./G-6/K????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.