YLR 2009

2009 PLP 38(1) (YLR)

MUHAMMAD IQBAL — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SATGHARA, OKARA and

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 985/H of 2008, decided on 15th September, 2008.
Honorable Judges
Umar Ata Bandial, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2009 PLP 38(1) (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Umar Ata Bandial, J
Parties MUHAMMAD IQBAL — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SATGHARA, OKARA and
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 38(1) (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 38(1) (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Umar Ata Bandial, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 38(1) (YLR) (MUHAMMAD IQBAL — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SATGHARA, OKARA and). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 491

Habeas corpus petition

S.H.O. had disclosed that three attempts had been made by the functionaries to recover the alleged detenues from three different locations but in vain

Held, it was beyond the ambit of habeas corpus petition for the police to go on a wild goose chase--S.H.O. was directed by High Court to record the statement of the petitioner as to the disappearance of the alleged detenues and take action thereon in accordance with law

Order accordingly. Muhammad Nouman Shams Qazi for the Petitioner. Nayyar Abbas Rizvi, A.A.-G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

UMAR ATA BANDIAL, J.

Report of respondent No.1 discloses that three attempts have been made by the respondents Nos.1 & 2 to recover the alleged detenues from three different locations but in vain. It is beyond the ambit of this petition for the police to go on a wild goose chase. The respondent No.1 shall record the statement of the petitioner as to the disappearance of the alleged detenues and take action thereon in accordance with law.

2. Disposed of. M.B.A./M-426/L Order Accordingly.