PCRLJ 1983

1983 P Cr (PLP)

Mian NAZIR AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus MAGISTRATE (SECTION 30), JHELUM AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Writ Petition No. 4144 of 1979, decided on 31st July, 1979.
Honorable Judges
Aftab Hussain, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1983 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Aftab Hussain, J
Parties Mian NAZIR AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus MAGISTRATE (SECTION 30), JHELUM AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Aftab Hussain, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 P Cr (PLP) (Mian NAZIR AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus MAGISTRATE (SECTION 30), JHELUM AND OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

Representation

  • Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azim for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑ Art. 199 and Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 435/439 Constitutional jurisdictionRevision petition against order under S. 249‑A, Cr.P.C. pending in Court of Session‑Such being a more adequate remedy, writ petition dismissed as incompetent‑Sessions Judge directed to accelerate hearing of revision.

Judgment & Decree

MAGISTRATE (SECTION 30), JHELUM AND OTHERS‑Respondents Writ Petition No. 4144 of 1979, decided on 31st July, 1979. ‑‑ Art. 199 and Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 435/439 Constitutional jurisdictionRevision petition against order under S. 249‑A, Cr.P.C. pending in Court of Session‑Such being a more adequate remedy, writ petition dismissed as incompetent‑Sessions Judge directed to accelerate hearing of revision. Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azim for Petitioner. This petition is incompetent since a revision petition against an order passed under section 249‑A, Cr. P C. is pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Jhelum. It cannot be doubted that is a more adequate remedy. This petition is dismissed but the learned Sessions Judge is directed to accelerate the hearing of that revision petition. M.Y.H. Petition dismissed.