1987 PLP 1860 (SCMR)
MOHAMMAD SHAFIQUE‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1860 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | MOHAMMAD SHAFIQUE‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1860 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1860 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1860 (SCMR) (MOHAMMAD SHAFIQUE‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Abdus Saleem, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Muhammad Aslam, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 22nd July, 1987.
- We have heard Ch. Muhammad Abdus Saleem, Advocate, in support of this petition. He has not been able to convince us that the discretion exercised by the learned Judge of the High Court to cancel the bail allowed to the petitioner was exercised illegally or improperly. On the other hand, we agree with the learned Judge that this was not a case in which bail should have been allowed to the petitioner. Accordingly, we find no force in this petition, which is dismissed hereby.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 30‑6‑1987 of the Lahore High Court Lahore in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1693/B of 1987). ‑‑‑S. 497(5)‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑Bail‑ Cancellation of‑‑High Court cancelling bail allowed to petitioner by District Court‑‑Discretion of High, Court not having been exercised illegally or improperly, Supreme Court refused leave holding that it was not a case in which bail should have been allowed to petitioner‑ Leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑ This is a petition directed against the order dated 30‑6‑1987 passed by a learned Judge of the Lahore High Court whereby he cancelled the bail allowed to the petitioner by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad and ordered his arrest. We have heard Ch. Muhammad Abdus Saleem, Advocate, in support of this petition. He has not been able to convince us that the discretion exercised by the learned Judge of the High Court to cancel the bail allowed to the petitioner was exercised illegally or improperly. On the other hand, we agree with the learned Judge that this was not a case in which bail should have been allowed to the petitioner. Accordingly, we find no force in this petition, which is dismissed hereby. M .I . / M‑172/ S ‑‑‑‑‑ Petition dismissed.