2005 PLP 1777 (YLR)
LAL CHAND and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2005 PLP 1777 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari, J |
| Parties | LAL CHAND and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 1777 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 1777 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 1777 (YLR) (LAL CHAND and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17(3)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324 & 398
Bail, grant of --Bail had been sought on the ground that with the efforts of the elders of community, matter had been patched up and complainant had no objection if bail was granted
Affidavit of complainant and two prosecution witnesses had been filed in the Court-- Complainant along with prosecution witnesses present in Court had affirmed the fact that for the present he had no objection for grant of bail in view of resolution and reconciliation due to intervention by elders of community
State Counsel had stated no objection
Accused were directed to be enlarged on bail, in circumstances. Syed Maded Ali Shah for Applicants. Anwar H. Ansari for the State along with the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
S. 497
Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17(3)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324 & 398
Bail, grant of --Bail had been sought on the ground that with the efforts of the elders of community, matter had been patched up and complainant had no objection if bail was granted
Affidavit of complainant and two prosecution witnesses had been filed in the Court-- Complainant along with prosecution witnesses present in Court had affirmed the fact that for the present he had no objection for grant of bail in view of resolution and reconciliation due to intervention by elders of community
State Counsel had stated no objection
Accused were directed to be enlarged on bail, in circumstances. Syed Maded Ali Shah for Applicants. Anwar H. Ansari for the State along with the Complainant. Applicants are involved in Crime No.55 of 2004, Police Station Khipro, registered on the complaint of Sundar Das, under section 17 (3) Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordi nance, 1979, 398, 324, P.P.C. The bail is pressed on the ground that with the efforts of the elders of community, the matter has been patched up and that the complainant has no objection if the bail is granted. The affidavits of the complainant and two P.Ws. have been filed in the Court. The complainant along with P.Ws. is present in the Court anti has affirmed the fact that for the present he has no objection for grant of bail in view of resolution and reconciliation due to intervention by nekmards of the community. In the circumstances, learned State counsel has stated no objection. For the above reason, the applicants are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000 (Rupees one hundred thousand) each with PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. H.B.T./L-12/K Bail granted.