1989 PLP 742 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD TARIQ‑‑Petitioner. Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 742 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Riaz Ahmad, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD TARIQ‑‑Petitioner. Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 742 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 742 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Riaz Ahmad, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 742 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD TARIQ‑‑Petitioner. Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Hakeem Sahota for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 380 & 459‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly stealing tape‑recorder and some ornaments from shop of complainant by breaking its lock‑‑Accused behind bars for last five months‑‑Challan not yet submitted‑‑Bail allowed in circumstances. Miss Agnes Naseem for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 285/11 of 1989, decided on 11th February, 1989. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 380 & 459‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly stealing tape‑recorder and some ornaments from shop of complainant by breaking its lock‑‑Accused behind bars for last five months‑‑Challan not yet submitted‑‑Bail allowed in circumstances. Abdul Hakeem Sahota for Petitioner. Miss Agnes Naseem for the State. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had stolen a tape‑recorder belonging to the complainant from his shop in Kamunki.
2. Precisely, the allegation is that during the night, the complainant was sleeping, when some disturbance awoke him and he and his neighbour saw that the lock of his shop had been broken and soon thereafter, the petitioner was seen coming out running. On checking, it was found that a tape‑recorder belonging to the complainant and some ornaments were missing. In course of investigation, the tape‑recorder was recovered from the petitioner on 26th of September, 1988. While in respect of the ornaments, the complainant himself stated that the said ornaments had not been stolen and were found in the house. The challan has not yet been submitted and the petitioner is in judicial lock‑up, since 26th of September, 1988. The petitioner is behind the bars for the last five months, therefore, I direct that he shall be released on bail provided he furnishes security in the sum of Rs.25,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Gujranwala. SA./M‑1144/LBail allowed.