1989 P Cr (PLP)
ABDUL HANAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | ABDUL HANAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUL HANAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Kamal Mufti for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 304 & 148/149‑‑Bail, grant of‑ Accused causing simple stick injury to complainant and participating in occurrence after deceased had received injuries‑‑Co‑accused with similar allegations already allowed bail‑‑Bail allowed to accused in circumstances. Sh. Munir Ahmad for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Syed Kamal Mufti for Petitioner. Sh. Munir Ahmad for the State. Abdul Hanan has applied for bail. He alongwith 6 others is charged for the murder of Ahmad Mansoor and for murderously assaulting his father Chiragh Din and Nisar Ahmad P.W. with a dagger, spear, hatchets and Dangs on 31‑5‑1988.
2. The motive for the offence was that about 20/25 days prior to the occurrence Mst. Khalida a relation of the accused who was unmarried gave birth to an illegitimate child about whom a report was lodged with the police. The accused suspected that the deceased had reported the matter to the police. Hence the occurrence.
3. Bail for Abdul Hanan is claimed on the ground that he is not alleged to have caused any injury to the deceased but is attributed a simple stick injury to Chiragh Din complainant on his head. It is further stated that Irshad, Riasat and Abdur Rehman co‑accused who had also not caused any injury to the deceased but had caused injuries to Chiragh Din complainant and Nisar Ahmad P.W. have since been bailed out.
4. As per F.I.R. the petitioner is not alleged to have caused any injury to the deceased. He took part in the occurrence after the deceased had fallen injured and gave a simple stick blow to Chiragh Din complainant. His co‑accused with similar allegations have already been admitted to bail.
5. In view of the above circumstances, I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Kasur. S.A./A‑469/L Bail allowed.