1989 PLP 309 (SCMR)
Mst. MATAB BIBI — Petitioner Versus SHAMIM AKHTAR and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 309 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. MATAB BIBI — Petitioner Versus SHAMIM AKHTAR and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Muhammadan Law |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 309 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Muhammadan Law as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 309 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 309 (SCMR) (Mst. MATAB BIBI — Petitioner Versus SHAMIM AKHTAR and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Hasan. Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rang Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 1st August, 1988.
- Ch. Muhammad Hasan. Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rang Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order dated 29-3-1982 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Civil Revision No. 1648 of 1981).
Gift--Leave to appeal granted to examine that even if gift made by donor in petitioner's favour had to be annulled, whether by virtue of various Shariat Application laws that part of gift which related to inheritance of donor's own share should not have been allowed to remain intact. Hadayat v. Mehtab BIN 1972 S C M R 243 ref.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑A defendant (done) in a declaratory suit has sought leave to appeal against the dismissal of her civil revision by the High Court. The learned counsel has contended that even if the gift made by Mst.Bakhan in petitioner's favour had to be annulled, it needed examination whether by virtue of the various Shariat Application Laws, that part of the gift which related to the inheritance of Mst. Bakhan's own share (1/4th) should not have been allowed to remain intact, needed further examination. He has relied on Hadayat v. Mehtab Bibi (1972 SCMR 243). Question raised requires examination. Leave to appeal, accordingly, is granted. Security Rs.5,
000. The appeal shall be prepared on the present record with direction for the filing of all additional necessary documents.