2003 PLP 1735 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD IMRAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2003 PLP 1735 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD IMRAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 1735 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 1735 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 1735 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD IMRAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Hussain Chhachhar for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302(b)
Three persons from the side of defence including the accused were also injured in the occurrence, but their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution
Injury attributed to the accused to the injured prosecution witness was simple in nature
Police Officer present in the Court had submitted that an order had been passed by the Investigating Officer that a cross-version should also be registered against the complainant party-- Accused had not touched the deceased and from the defence side three persons including the accused were also injured and their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution-- Accused was allowed the bail in circumstances. M. Yaseen Farrukh Kamboh for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
S.497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302(b)
Three persons from the side of defence including the accused were also injured in the occurrence, but their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution
Injury attributed to the accused to the injured prosecution witness was simple in nature
Police Officer present in the Court had submitted that an order had been passed by the Investigating Officer that a cross-version should also be registered against the complainant party-- Accused had not touched the deceased and from the defence side three persons including the accused were also injured and their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution-- Accused was allowed the bail in circumstances. Ch. Muhammad Hussain Chhachhar for Petitioner. M. Yaseen Farrukh Kamboh for the Complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as far as, petitioner is concerned, only simple injury on the person of Younis injured P.W. is attributed to him, that including the petitioner two other co-accused were also injured in this case and their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution, that after the investigation, it had been ordered by the Investigating Officer that complainant party should also be challaned in this case and that case of the petitioner is of further inquiry falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant submits that after the occurrence complainant party was so much worried and took the deceased in an injured condition to the General Hospital, Lahore, that in fact petitioner was not injured during the occurrence, that injuries on the person of the petitioner are self-suffered and the offence alleged against him falls within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the instant case, three persons from the side of the petitioner including the petitioner were injured and their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution. The injury attributed to the petitioner to the injured P.W. namely, Younis is simple in nature S.-I. present in Court submits that an order has been passed by the Investigating Officer that a cross-version should also be registered against the complainant party. As the petitioner has not touched the deceased and moreover from the petitioner side including the petitioner three persons were also injured and their injuries were suppressed by the prosecution, this petition is accepted. Petitioner is allowed bail subject to furnishing bail bonds to the tune of Rs.50,000 (fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. H.B.T./M-1785/L Bail granted.