1995 PLP 1233 (SCMR)
of Finance and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus RAFIQ AHMAD MALIK and others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1995 PLP 1233 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Manzoor Hussain Sial and Mir Hazar Khan Khsoso, JJ |
| Parties | of Finance and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus RAFIQ AHMAD MALIK and others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 1233 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 1233 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Manzoor Hussain Sial and Mir Hazar Khan Khsoso, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 1233 (SCMR) (of Finance and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus RAFIQ AHMAD MALIK and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in all Petitions).
- M. Munir Peracha, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents (in all Petitions).
- Date of hearing: 15th February, 1995.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgments dated 13‑7‑94, 18‑4‑94 and 13‑4‑94 of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench in Writ Petitions Nos. 1713/94, 1753/94, 2381/94 and 2782/94 respectively). ‑‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Civil service‑‑‑Payment of Secretariat Allowance‑‑ Entitlement‑‑‑High Court directing Government to pay Secretariat Allowance to respondents (employees) pending adjudication of Constitutional petition‑‑ Validity‑‑‑Petitions for leave to appeal not only impugned interim orders but were barred by time for over 18 days‑‑‑Explanation tendered for condonation of delay was hardly satisfactory‑‑‑Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances. Federation of Pakistan v. Abdur Rehman C.P. No. 165 of 1994 rel.
Judgment & Decree
MANZOOR HUSSAIN SIAL, J.‑‑‑By this order we propose to dispose of Civil Petitions Nos. 461, 462, 463 and 464 of 1994, as they arise out of similar facts and raise identical legal point therein.
2. The petitioners seek leave to appeal against similar orders passed by the learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court (Multan Bench) directing the petitioners to pay Secretariat Allowance to the respondents pending decision of the writ petitions filed by them.
3. The orders impugned were passed by the learned Single Judge in the Lahore High Court on the strength of the direction made by this Court to the petitioners for payment of Secretariat Allowance in Federation of Pakistan v. Abdur Rehman (C.P.No.165 of 1994).
3. All the abovenoted petitions not only impugned interim orders but are barred by time for over 18 days. The explanation tendered for condonation of delay is hardly satisfactory. We are, therefore, not inclined to grant leave in these petitions so as to call for interference in the impugned orders and dismiss these petitions. AA./F‑349/S Petitions dismissed.