1984 PLP 1437 (PLC(CS))
THROUGH DISTRICT MANAGER, ICHHRA DEPOT, LAHORE Versus SALEEM MAHMOOD
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1437 (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, |
| Parties | THROUGH DISTRICT MANAGER, ICHHRA DEPOT, LAHORE Versus SALEEM MAHMOOD |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XX11I of 1969)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1437 (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XX11I of 1969)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1437 (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi,.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1437 (PLC(CS)) (THROUGH DISTRICT MANAGER, ICHHRA DEPOT, LAHORE Versus SALEEM MAHMOOD). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Noor Ahmad for Appellant.
- Yousaf Hussain Dilawari for Respondent.
- Date of hearing : 16th June, 1982.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ S. 25‑A‑Reinstatement‑Workman appointed into service prior in date to other two, whose service allowed to be continued on abolition of post of respondent‑Held, junior most workman should have been terminated‑Order of reinstatement of workman senior in position ordered with back benefits.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. LHR‑834 of 1980, decided on 23rd June, 1982. ‑‑ S. 25‑A‑Reinstatement‑Workman appointed into service prior in date to other two, whose service allowed to be continued on abolition of post of respondent‑Held, junior most workman should have been terminated‑Order of reinstatement of workman senior in position ordered with back benefits. Syed Noor Ahmad for Appellant. Yousaf Hussain Dilawari for Respondent. Date of hearing : 16th June, 1982. This appeal arises from the decision, dated 11th November, 1980 passed by the learned Presiding Officer; Punjab Labour Court No. 1, Lahore, whereby the grievance petition of the respondent was accepted and he was directed to be reinstated in service with back benefits.
2. The respondent was recruited as Junior Clerk in Ichhra Depot of P. U. T. C. vide appointment letter Exh. D. 1 on 3rd June, 1980. His services were terminated on 19th August, 1980. within probationary period. In the order of termination no explicit reason was given or the termina tion Although in the termination order no reason was given for the termination, yet admittedly the post was abolished. Vide appointment letter Exh. P. 2 Muhammad Ramzan was recruited in Ichhra Depot ob 5th July, 1980. Vide appointment letter EA. P. 3 one Saifullah was recruited in the same depot on 8th July, 1980. Since the two person were recruited after the respondent, they were junior to him and, therefore, if his post had been abolished, Saifullah who was the' junior most should have been terminated and not the respondent. 1n these circumstances, the learned trial Judge was justified in directing the' reinstatement of the respondent in service with back benefits. There is no‑‑force in the appeal, which is dismissed. M. Y. M