PCRLJ 2008

2008 P Cr (PLP)

BASHIR AHMED and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2006-July-12
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2008 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties BASHIR AHMED and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 P Cr (PLP) (BASHIR AHMED and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Ghazanfar Ali Khan for Petitioners.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337-A(ii), 337-F(v), 334, 379, 342, 148 & 149

Bail, grant of

Single stick blow had been attributed to accused

Medico-legal report showed that the dimension of the injury attributed to accused was 1/2 cm x 1/4 cm x skin deep

Prima facie it did not appear to be an injury caused by "Dang" (stick)

Complainant had thrown a very wide net and had implicated twenty one persons in the case

Accused, in circumstances was admitted to bail.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J.

This petition to the extent of Bashir Ahmad petitioner is dismissed as having not been pressed for the time being.

2. Manzoor Ahmad has sought post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.6 registered at Police Station Sadar Khanpur on 6-1-2006 for offences under sections 379/342/148/149, P.P.C. After the receipt of medico-legal reports (M.L.Rs.) offences under sections 337-A(ii)/337-F(v)/334, P.P.C. were added.

3. Briefly, according to prosecution case, twenty-one accused, including the petitioner, who were armed, launched criminal assault upon the complainant party and caused injuries to four persons. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that he gave a stick blow on the nose of Faiz-ul-Hassan P.W.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the relevant record of the case.

5. It has been noticed that a single stick blow has been attributed to the petitioner; that according to M.L.R., the dimension of the injury attributed to the petitioner was 1/2 c.m. x 1/4 c.m. x skin deep. Prima facie, it does not appear to be an injury caused by Dang. Further more, the complainant threw a very large net and implicated twenty-one persons in the case. In these circumstances, I am inclined to admit the petitioner to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rupees fifty thousands with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./B-13/L Bail granted.