1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
MUNAWAR AHMAD LEGHARI Versus INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE and 2 others
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada Chairman |
| Parties | MUNAWAR AHMAD LEGHARI Versus INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE and 2 others |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada Chairman.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MUNAWAR AHMAD LEGHARI Versus INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Rahim for Appellant.
- A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 14th February, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Appellant, Inspector of Police had created problems for his senior officers where he was posted
Complaints about appellant's work and conduct, from public were also received and even a strike was organised against his behaviour and highhandedness
Appellant had thus brought a bad name to the entire police force
Appellant had been punished seven times under departmental proceedings against him
Range D.I..G. had described appellant as unfit for posting as S.H.O.
Assessment of senior Police Officers about appellant appearing to be correct
Appellant was found often missing from weekly parade as well as from place of his posting-- Appellant was reported as corrupt and his integrity was categorised as `D' and his behaviour with public as "Below Average"
Remarks against appellant having been recorded purely on merit, expunction of adverse remarks was declined in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE and 2 others Appeal No. 616 of 1990, decided on 9th March, 1991.
Appellant, Inspector of Police had created problems for his senior officers where he was posted
Complaints about appellant's work and conduct, from public were also received and even a strike was organised against his behaviour and highhandedness
Appellant had thus brought a bad name to the entire police force
Appellant had been punished seven times under departmental proceedings against him
Range D.I..G. had described appellant as unfit for posting as S.H.O.
Assessment of senior Police Officers about appellant appearing to be correct
Appellant was found often missing from weekly parade as well as from place of his posting-- Appellant was reported as corrupt and his integrity was categorised as `D' and his behaviour with public as "Below Average"
Remarks against appellant having been recorded purely on merit, expunction of adverse remarks was declined in circumstances. M. Rahim for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents. Date of hearing: 14th February, 1991.